

Lafluffy, I don't think we've gone wrong. I didn't mean to pick on you...most of us do it from time to time, heaven knows. Mick is spectacularly beautiful, and he's got a heart and a soul to boot--what's not to love?lafluffy wrote:Hey, sorry about that!allegrita wrote:![]()
It took forever for me to get the pic on the page so I missed your wonderful defence of Mick and Alex at soul level. Can't say I disagree with you at all! Frankly, if that body belonged to someone other than the guy who played Mick I wouldn't give it the time of day. Sigh. Sometimes ya can't win no matter how you cut it. I see Mick as a whole. I cringe and blush when things go south too much; I'm really not interested in fantasising and don't care to hear others' fantasies (I guess that's why I don't read fanfic- don't hurt me). He's lovely to look at. But as a whole, beautiful body, beautiful soul.
I think the original idea of talking about Mick turned into drooling over pix of Mick. All about Mick (the subject title) is so much more than just the pix. Where did we go wrong?
I agree with you, Allegrita, but playing devil's advocate here, if Alex was not beautiful on the outisde as well as having an amazing spirit and depth of soul and character, how many among us would have ever been hooked like we have? So while we eventually saw all of those amazing qualities, if the "pretty" hadn't been there as well, would we have even paid attention to Mick St. John in the first place? Let's get a show of hands of ladies here who tuned in for the first episode because of "the hot guy" on the preview commercials.allegrita wrote:Lafluffy, I don't think we've gone wrong. I didn't mean to pick on you...most of us do it from time to time, heaven knows. Mick is spectacularly beautiful, and he's got a heart and a soul to boot--what's not to love?lafluffy wrote:Hey, sorry about that!allegrita wrote:![]()
It took forever for me to get the pic on the page so I missed your wonderful defence of Mick and Alex at soul level. Can't say I disagree with you at all! Frankly, if that body belonged to someone other than the guy who played Mick I wouldn't give it the time of day. Sigh. Sometimes ya can't win no matter how you cut it. I see Mick as a whole. I cringe and blush when things go south too much; I'm really not interested in fantasising and don't care to hear others' fantasies (I guess that's why I don't read fanfic- don't hurt me). He's lovely to look at. But as a whole, beautiful body, beautiful soul.
I think the original idea of talking about Mick turned into drooling over pix of Mick. All about Mick (the subject title) is so much more than just the pix. Where did we go wrong?It's far too easy for admiration to tip over into objectification. I just think that he deserves more from us, the people who've loved him through thick and thin, rooted for him to get the girl (whichever girl it was), died a little inside when he was staked, cried for him when he failed, cheered for him when he prevailed. We lose sight sometimes of the depth of character that Mick (the character) really has, and we get distracted by the pretty wrapping.
![]()
![]()
Who here is not also appreciative of Alex's or Jason's talent? As we stated above, if it was just a pretty package with no substance, we would have all moved on eons ago.PNWgal wrote:When I saw the first commercial for Moonlight (CBS was still calling it Twilight), I turned to my man and said "Hey look. New vampire show on CBS."
So...no. I didn't turn on the show because of the "hot guy" playing a vampire. I tuned because it was a vampire show and I'm a vampire girl. The fact that Alex was beautiful was icing, but the first episode left me cold - lucky for me I gave the show another chance and Alex completely hooked me in OOTP. To me, Alex WAS Mick - no other actor could have pulled me so completely.
Here's a thought: If a bunch of guys were talking about Sophia and Shannyn the way we sometimes talk about Alex (and on occasion, Jason), how insulted would we as women be that they were objectified and not appreciated for their talent?